- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 31 Jul 2002 12:21:53 -0500
- To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Aha! now I see what you mean. Yes, a 404 or at least a "never heard of that question" diagnostic would be better. On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 11:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> > Subject: Re: pls register for ftf4, 7-8 Oct 2002 in Bristol > Date: 31 Jul 2002 10:40:21 -0500 > > > On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 10:28, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > Sorry, I mistyped the URL. > > > > > > Which brings up an interface questions. Would it not be better to have > > > questions that don't exist yet be errors of some kind instead of being > > > blank questions? > > > > questions that don't exist yet???? > > > > At > > http://www.w3.org/2000/11/msm/vote.php3?wgid=30310&qno=ftf4att > > > > I see > > "ftf4att do you plan to attend the 4th ftf 7-8 Oct in Bristol, UK?" > > among other things. > > > > Don't you? > > > > Try > > http://www.w3.org/2000/11/msm/vote.php3?wgid=30310&qno=tft4att > > to see a question that does not yet exists. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you in Montreal in August at Extreme Markup 2002?
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 13:21:31 UTC