- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 18 Jul 2002 14:09:59 -0500
- To: ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Do you mean to raise a new issue? This looks an awful lot like an existing one... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I2.4-Enumerated-Classes On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 11:00, ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com wrote: > > is there a chance to have enumeration classes already in OWL lite? yes, there's a chance; in fact, they're in DAML+OIL, so unless we decide to remove them, we will have them. > I think they > are quite common and easy to understand. The inferences they will be used in > are typically quite simple There's quite a bit of subtlety there; see, for example, the peopleKey test case I discussed in... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jul/0132.html > (for instance consistency on the instance level: to > make sure that a slot can have a value only from this set). > > Ruediger -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 15:09:57 UTC