ISSUE: owl:Class still needed

TITLE:  owl:Class still needed


  The introduction of daml:Class as a subclass of rdfs:Class
  was largely motivated by the fact that rdfs:Class
  prohibited cycles.  The W3C RDF Core WG recently removed
  this restriction.  Is there still a need for a separate

  Issue 5.1 [1] also discusses this distinction, but is more
  appropriately focused on the disjointness of
  ObjectProperty and DatatypeProperty.

RAISED BY:  Mike Dean


Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 20:08:44 UTC