Thursday, 1 August 2002
Wednesday, 31 July 2002
- OWL feature synopsis, reference, abstract syntax released as W3C WDs
- RE: 5.20, need for synonyms
- RE: 5.20, need for synonyms
- Re: pls register for ftf4, 7-8 Oct 2002 in Bristol
- Re: pls register for ftf4, 7-8 Oct 2002 in Bristol
- Re: pls register for ftf4, 7-8 Oct 2002 in Bristol
- Re: pls register for ftf4, 7-8 Oct 2002 in Bristol
- Re: pls register for ftf4, 7-8 Oct 2002 in Bristol
- WOWG: STRAW POLL for f2f5 location
- WOWG: Welcome Motorola to WOWG
Tuesday, 30 July 2002
- pls register for ftf4, 7-8 Oct 2002 in Bristol
- Re: ADMIN: Update 3 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: TEST: Manifest files
- Re: ADMIN: Update 3 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon
- Re: ADMIN: Update 3 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: TEST: Manifest files
- Re: ADMIN: Update 3 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: ADMIN: Update 3 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: ADMIN: Update 3 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: TEST: Manifest files
- Re: TEST: Manifest files
- ADMIN: Update 3 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: TEST: Manifest files
- Re: TEST: Manifest files
- Re: comments on issue 5.19 (classes as instances) and 4.6 (equivalentTo)
- Re: TEST: Manifest files
- TEST: Manifest files
- Re: comments on issue 5.19 (classes as instances) and 4.6 (equivalentTo)
Monday, 29 July 2002
- Re: comments on issue 5.19 (classes as instances) and 4.6 (equivalentTo)
- Re: ADMIN: Update 2 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- ADMIN: Update 2 of Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Feature synopsis: any more edits?
- Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1
Sunday, 28 July 2002
- Re: Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- WOWG: How Google takes all (a story from 2009)
- Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1
Saturday, 27 July 2002
- Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1
- Re: new document urls
- Re: 5.20, need for synonyms
- Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- new document urls
- Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1
- Re: 5.20, need for synonyms
- Re: 5.20, need for synonyms
Friday, 26 July 2002
- Re: 5.20, need for synonyms
- Re: 5.20, need for synonyms
- comments on issue 5.19 (classes as instances) and 4.6 (equivalentTo)
- Re: TEST: mapVocab and Euler [was: LANG: closing issue 4.6]
- Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- 5.20, need for synonyms
- Re: TEST: mapVocab and Euler [was: LANG: closing issue 4.6]
- Regrets for 8/1 Telecon
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1
- Re: Fwd: Plan for Namespaces 1.1 Last Call Draft
- Re: Fwd: Plan for Namespaces 1.1 Last Call Draft
- TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1
- Re: TOOLS: dumpont
- TOOLS: dumpont
- Re: TEST: proposal for test case structure
- WOWG: THANKS (was Re: Minutes of July 25 Telecon)
- Fwd: Plan for Namespaces 1.1 Last Call Draft
- TEST: mapVocab and Euler [was: LANG: closing issue 4.6]
Thursday, 25 July 2002
- Re: ADMIN: Updated Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: ADMIN: Updated Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- ADMIN: Updated Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Minutes of July 25 Telecon
- Re: update to abstract syntax synopsis document
- Belated regrets
- update to abstract syntax synopsis document
- Re: Appendix C. http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
- update to feature synopsis document to include functional and inverse functional
- Telecon regrets (various Aug)
- 2002-07-25 telecon apologies
- RE: ADMIN: Agenda for July 25, 2002 telecon
- Re: ADMIN: Agenda for July 25, 2002 telecon
- Re: ADMIN: Agenda for July 25, 2002 telecon
- Re: ADMIN: Agenda for July 25, 2002 telecon
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: ADMIN: Agenda for July 25, 2002 telecon
- ADMIN: Agenda for July 25, 2002 telecon
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: Appendix C. http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
Wednesday, 24 July 2002
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: Appendix C. http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
- Re: Appendix C. http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
- Re: Appendix C. http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Appendix C. http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- LANG: closing issue 4.6 (was Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon)
- Re: ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon
- ADMIN: Draf agenda for July 25 telecon
Tuesday, 23 July 2002
Monday, 22 July 2002
Sunday, 21 July 2002
Saturday, 20 July 2002
- SEM: StructuredDatatypes: XML Schema formalism paper
- Re: Consistency, decidability, etc (was Re: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values was RE: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002)
Friday, 19 July 2002
- RE: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values
- Re: Consistency, decidability, etc (was Re: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values was RE: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002)
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
- Re: WOWG: Chairs reminder -- was Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
- Re: Consistency, decidability, etc (was Re: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values was RE: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002)
- Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances
- Re: WOWG: Chairs reminder -- was Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
- Re: WOWG: Chairs reminder -- was Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
- WOWG: Chairs reminder -- was Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
- RE: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values
- RE: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values
Thursday, 18 July 2002
- TEST - implementation report (oops)
- TEST: eventual implementation report
- Re: comments on 18 July 2002 version of reference document
- referring to the issue list
- new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- Re: status of issue list
- Re: comments on 18 July 2002 version of reference document
- Re: comments on 18 July 2002 version of reference document
- Re: status of issue list
- Re: requirements document comment
- Re: requirements document comment
- Re: update to the feature synopsis document
- Re: ADMIN: Log of telecon July 18
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement (sameState over peopleKey)
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement (sameState over peopleKey)
- Re: status of issue list
- Re: comments on 18 July 2002 version of reference document
- close-to-WD version of abstract syntax document
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement (sameState over peopleKey)
- Re: ADMIN: Log of telecon July 18
- status of issue list
- Re: ISSUE: enumeration classes (2.4)
- Re: ISSUE: enumeration classes (2.4)
- RE: possible reformatting of issue document
- Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- Re: ISSUE: enumeration classes (2.4)
- Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- RE: possible reformatting of issue document
- Re: new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- Re: TEST: proposal for test case structure
- new issue? should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects
- comments on 18 July 2002 version of reference document
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement (sameState over peopleKey)
- ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty PROPOSED RESOLUTION
- Re: XML entities in WG documents
- Re: XML entities in WG documents
- regrets for several telecons
- Re: ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty PROPOSED RESOLUTION
- XML entities in WG documents
- ADMIN: Log of telecon July 18
- ISSUE:3.4 daml:unambiguousProperty PROPOSED RESOLUTION
- ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty PROPOSED RESOLUTION
- Belated regrets 7/18 telecon
- Re: ISSUE:3.4 daml:unambiguousProperty
- Offer to host 5th f2f
- ADMIN: regrets for 1 August
- Consistency, decidability, etc (was Re: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values was RE: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002)
- RE: ISSUE: owl:quote - 5.4 and 4.3
- 5th F2F
- Re: possible reformatting of issue document
- Re: requirements document comment
- Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances
- Regrets for 7/18 and 7/25
- Re: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values (sameState, peopleKey TESTs)
- Re: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values was RE: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002
- Re: requirements document comment
- Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances
- possible reformatting of issue document
- regrets for 25 July and tardiness for 18 July
- Re: do we really need two languages/levels? [Issue 5.2]
- Re: TEST: proposal for test case structure
- requirements document comment
- Re: ISSUE: owl:quote - 5.4 and 4.3
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- RE: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- ISSUE: owl:quote - 5.4 and 4.3
- RE: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- ACTION: implications of removing class descriptions from Owl Lite
- ISSUE: owl:Class still needed
Wednesday, 17 July 2002
- ISSUE: drop disjointUnionOf
- RE: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- Re: ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- Re: AGENDA: telecon July 18 (ftf pointer)
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002
- Re: TEST: proposal for test case structure
- Re: SEM: 5.1 literal/data values (sameState, peopleKey TESTs)
- RE: Regrets telecon July 18
- Regrets (partial) telecon July 18
- AGENDA: telecon July 18
- RE: Bristol face2face, October
- Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record
- Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record
- Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances
- Re: Bristol face2face, October
- Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record
- Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances
- Re: SEM: discussions concerning model theory (Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record)
- Re: dia2owl -- convert UML diagram from dia to OWL using XSLT
- Re: SEM: discussions concerning model theory (Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record)
- RE: TEST: proposal for test case structure
- Re: TEST: proposal for test case structure
- RE: Bristol face2face, October
- RE: Bristol face2face, October
- RE: Bristol face2face, October
- regrets telecon 2002-07-18
- RE: Bristol face2face, October
- REGRETS Telcon 18.7, 25.7, 3.8
Tuesday, 16 July 2002
- Re: SEM: discussions concerning model theory (Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record)
- Re: SEM: discussions concerning model theory (Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record)
- Re: SEM: discussions concerning model theory (Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record)
- Re: SEM: discussions concerning model theory (Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record)
- Re: Bristol face2face, October
- SEM: discussions concerning model theory (Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record)
- Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances
- ADMIN: 5th F2F
- Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record
- TEST: proposal for test case structure
- SEM: 5.1 literal/data values was RE: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002
- RE: parseType=Collection and rdf:List
Monday, 15 July 2002
- rdf:parseType=Collection and rdf:List
- Re: OWL Reference Description for F2F 3
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002
- WOWG: Fwd: XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- Re: OWL Reference Description for F2F 3
- ADMIN: Minutes of telecon 11th July 2002
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- Re: update to the feature synopsis document
- RE: Input sought on datatyping tradeoff
- Re: OWL Reference Description for F2F 3
Saturday, 13 July 2002
Friday, 12 July 2002
- Re: ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty
- TEST: Tools and implementation
- Chris' issue: properties and relations
- Re: ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty
- Re: ISSUE: Classes as instances
- Re: ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty
- from rdf-logic: Fwd: Input sought on datatyping tradeoff
- RE: ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty
- Re: ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty
- Re: ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty
- ISSUE:4.1 daml:uniqueProperty
- ISSUE:3.4 daml:unambiguousProperty
Thursday, 11 July 2002
- dia2owl -- convert UML diagram from dia to OWL using XSLT
- Re: ISSUE: functional, inversefunctional
- Re: do we really need two languages/levels? [Issue 5.2]
- ISSUE: functional, inversefunctional
- RE: AGENDA: July 11 telecon
- regrets for 18. July telecon
- Re: AGENDA: July 11 telecon
- ISSUE: enumeration classes
- RE: GUIDE: Revised outline
- RE: AGENDA: July 11 telecon
- GUIDE: Revised outline
- ISSUE: Classes as instances
- RE: do we really need two languages/levels? [Issue 5.2]
- GUIDE: Setting up namespaces, declaring ontology uri
- RE: do we really need two languages/levels? [Issue 5.2]
- Regrets July 11 telecon
- Re: do we really need two languages/levels? [Issue 5.2]
- Re: Issues 4.2, 5.2, 5.15, 5.16: proposal to CLOSE
- GUIDE: co-authoring
- regrets for 11 July
- Regrets for 11 July and 18 July telecons
- Re: do we really need two languages/levels? [Issue 5.2]
Wednesday, 10 July 2002
- RE: Issues opened
- do we really need two languages/levels? [Issue 5.2]
- Re: Issues 4.2, 5.2, 5.15, 5.16: proposal to CLOSE
- Re: ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record
- Re: Issues 4.2, 5.2, 5.15, 5.16: proposal to CLOSE
- AGENDA: July 11 telecon
- Issues 4.2, 5.2, 5.15, 5.16: proposal to CLOSE
- Regrets for July 11 telecon
- Issues opened
- Re: Bristol face2face, October
- Bristol face2face, October
- update to the feature synopsis document
- Regrets for 11/7 telecon
- ADMIN: draft ftf meeting record
Tuesday, 9 July 2002
Monday, 8 July 2002
- Regrets for July 11 telecom
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes of June 27 telecon
- Re: GUIDE: OWL Guide document
- Re: GUIDE: OWL Guide document
- GUIDE: OWL Guide document
Sunday, 7 July 2002
- LANG: new version of abstract syntax/translation document
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax (with transformation)
Saturday, 6 July 2002
Friday, 5 July 2002
- Re: confusion about the WG issue process
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax (with transformation)
- Re: issue 5.10: a position statement
Thursday, 4 July 2002
- regrets, telecon 2002-07-11
- Regrets for 11-Jul, 18-Jul and 25-Jul Teleconfs
- issue 5.10: a position statement
- Re: confusion about the WG issue process
- Re: LANG: new version of abstract syntax (with transformation)
- regrets for the next 3 teleconfs
- Re: confusion about the WG issue process
- Re: confusion about the WG issue process
- RE: confusion about the WG issue process
Wednesday, 3 July 2002
- Re: confusion about the WG issue process
- confusion about the WG issue process
- wording isTheOnlyValueFor, IsTheOnlyOne, inverseFunctional
Tuesday, 2 July 2002
- Fashion Handbags and Hair accessories
- Issue: Unique Names Assumption Support
- LANG: new version of abstract syntax (with transformation)
- Re: GUIDE: an example When and How to Use a xxx language
- GUIDE: an example When and How to Use a xxx language
- Extra documents from Peter
- Re: ADMIN: telecon (today) details needed - URGENT
- ADMIN: telecon (today) details needed - URGENT