Wednesday, 1 January 2003
Tuesday, 31 December 2002
- Re: review of Reference, Guide, and Features
- Re: Semantic Review
- Re: Semantic Review
- Re: Semantic Review
- Re: doing unnecessary work to keep Jeremy happy
- Re: doing unnecessary work to keep Jeremy happy
- rdfs:Datatype vs owl:Datatype
- doing unnecessary work to keep Jeremy happy
- Re: Overall review
- Re: Semantic Review
- Proposal to reopen issue 5.3 semantic layering
- Re: Feature Synopsis Review
- RE: Suntax comments on the Guide document
- Overall review
- Semantic Review
- Reference Review
- Guide review
- Feature Synopsis Review
- Re: Suntax comments on the Guide document
- Background for reviews
- information description of OWL/DL graphs
- Suntax comments on the Guide document
- Re: LANG: Defn of DL in Mappings
- Re: keeping Jeremy happy
- Re: WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
- Re: LANG: Defn of DL in Mappings
- Re: review of Guide
- Re: WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
- Re: How to close issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL
- Re: LANG: Defn of DL in Mappings
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- Re: review of Guide
- RE: keeping Jeremy happy
- RE: review of Reference, Guide, and Features
- Reviews of OWL documents
- Review of Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases
- RE: review of Reference, Guide, and Features
- RE: review of Reference, Guide, and Features
- keeping Jeremy happy
Monday, 30 December 2002
- Action: Review of satisfaction of requirements
- Re: review of Reference, Guide, and Features
- Re: OWL/DL in RDF graphs
- Re: Requirements Document - Latest Version
- review of Reference, Guide, and Features
- XML presentation syntax Schemas for OWL Lite/DL/Full
- OWL/DL in RDF graphs
- Re: SEM: Layering bug
- Re: WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
- Re: WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
- Re: How to close issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL
- Re: WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
Friday, 27 December 2002
Thursday, 26 December 2002
- Re: WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
- Re: Abstract Syntax and Semantics: review comments
- Re: WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
- WOWG: Preliminary Face to Face Agenda
Wednesday, 25 December 2002
Tuesday, 24 December 2002
- Re: WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
- WOWG: Documents to review (all members - deadlines included)
- Re: Abstract Syntax and Semantics: review comments
Monday, 23 December 2002
- RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
- RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
- Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
Sunday, 22 December 2002
Saturday, 21 December 2002
Friday, 20 December 2002
- RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
- Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
- Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
- Re: ADMIN: minutes of Dec 19th telecon
- Re: SEM: Layering bug
- Re: Abstract Syntax and Semantics: review comments
- Abstract Syntax and Semantics: review comments
- RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
- Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
- Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18
- Re: ADMIN: minutes of Dec 19th telecon
- Re: SEM: Layering bug
- RE: LANG: Defn of DL in Mappings
- SEM: Layering bug
- ADMIN: minutes of Dec 19th telecon
- Reference document: a review
- LANG: Defn of DL in Mappings
- TEST,GUIDE,LANG: cardinality and DTDs
- WOWG: Congrats to All
Thursday, 19 December 2002
- RE: Complexity and implementability of OWL languages
- Events at OMG related to using UML as an OWL presentation syntax
- Re: How to close issue 5.17 - XML presentation syntax
- new XML presentation syntax Schema
- Re: Requirements Document - Latest Version
- owl:versionInfo (was Re: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12)
- Re: Requirements Document - Latest Version
- Re: Requirements Document - Latest Version
- URIs for user-defined datatypes for use in OWL
- RE: Complexity and implementability of OWL languages
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12
- Re: How to close issue 5.8 datatypes
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12
- Complexity and implementability of OWL languages
- WOWG: Working Group has been extended
- RE: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics for Dec 19 telecon-dialing in at 12:40 - Marwan
- Re: Issue 5.17 XML presentation syntax for OWL
- TEST: xml entitites in test cases?
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- OWL Reference: Latest version
- Re: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12
- Re: How to close issue 5.8 datatypes
- ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics for Dec 19 telecon
- Re: How to close issue 5.18 - unique names (was RE: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12)
Wednesday, 18 December 2002
- Requirements Document - Latest Version
- Guide: Latest version
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- How to close issue 5.18 - unique names (was RE: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12)
- Re: How to close issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL
- Admin: regrets Dec 19
- RE: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12
- Re: LANG: owl:Thing subClassOf owl:Thing
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- Re: oneOf explicit dt values
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- LANG: owl:Thing subClassOf owl:Thing
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- Regrets for f2f and 2002-12-19 and 2003-01-02 telecons
- TEST: latest draft - timescales
- RE: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 5th
- preliminary agenda - Dec 19 telecon
- Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- Re: How to close issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL
Tuesday, 17 December 2002
- ADMIN: regrets Dec 19 and Jan 2
- ADMIN: Minutes Dec 12
- 5.17 again - Re: How to close issue 5.17 - XML presentation syntax
- Re: How to close issue 5.17 - XML presentation syntax
- Re: How to close issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL
- Re: How to close issue 5.17 - XML presentation syntax
- Re: How to close issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL
- Re: How to close issue 5.17 - XML presentation syntax
- owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
- How to close issue 5.17 - XML presentation syntax
- How to close issue 5.8 datatypes
- How to close issue 5.13 - internet media type for OWL
- OWL DL is very restrictive
- oneOf explicit dt values
- Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics
- Re: Feature Synopsis document: a review
- Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics
- Re: editorial tweak to OWL semantics doc
Monday, 16 December 2002
- Re: editorial tweak to OWL semantics doc
- Re: editorial tweak to OWL semantics doc
- Re: Issue 5.17 XML presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: editorial tweak to OWL semantics doc
- ADMIN: telecon dates through f2f
- Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics
- Re: editorial tweak to OWL semantics doc
- Feature Synopsis document: a review
- Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics
- Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics
Sunday, 15 December 2002
Friday, 13 December 2002
- vizualizing webont chatlogs with SVG
- WOWG: HUMO(U)R from our bloggers...
- datatypes part 3
- Move OneOf to Owl Full (carried over from telecon)
- ADMIN: Revised Minutes Dec 5th
- Re: TEST: format of issue 5.6 - owl:imports
Thursday, 12 December 2002
- RE: Guide: Tags added
- Re: Guide: Tags added
- Guide: Tags added
- Re: Abstentions on closure of internet media type issue
- Re: Abstentions on closure of internet media type issue
- Re: TEST: format of issue 5.6 - owl:imports
- Abstentions on closure of internet media type issue
- Re: ISSUE 5.14 Closing Text
- Re: owl lite starting to look like more trouble than it's worth
- RE: GUIDE: vocabulary words in TOC, please
- Owl Lite v. Owl DL - from heat light (was ... hasValue ...)
- Re: TEST: format of issue 5.6 - owl:imports
- Re: ISSUE 5.14 Closing Text
- proxy voting
- RE: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- RE: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- RE: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Regrets for 12-Dec, 19-Dec, 26-Dec, 2-Jan
- RE: GUIDE: 5.9 malformed restrictions: "don't do that"
- RE: ADMIN: Minutes Dec 5th
- RE: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- RE: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- RE: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Vote on hasValue (was Re: owl lite starting to look like more trouble than it's worth)
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Oops (Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics)
- Review comments on OWL Semantics
- Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18 - Unique names assumption
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: owl lite starting to look like more trouble than it's worth
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: Issue 5.13 mediatypes: Proposal to CLOSE
- Re: Issue 5.13 mediatypes: Proposal to CLOSE
- Re: owl lite starting to look like more trouble than it's worth
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
Wednesday, 11 December 2002
- Re: owl lite starting to look like more trouble than it's worth
- Re: Issue 5.17 XML presentation syntax for OWL
- owl lite starting to look like more trouble than it's worth
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- SEM/TEST: "a" owl:differentFrom "b", no?
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: Issue 5.13 mediatypes: Proposal to CLOSE
- GUIDE: 5.9 malformed restrictions: "don't do that"
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18 - Unique names assumption
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- GUIDE: vocabulary words in TOC, please
- Re: datatypes part 3
- Re: TEST: format of issue 5.6 - owl:imports
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: ISSUE: justifications (postponed)
- Blank nodes in OWL DL, OWL Lite
- regrets for Dec. 12 telecon
- datatypes part 3
- ADMIN: Minutes Dec 5th
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: ADMIN: Agenda for December 12 telecon
- Re: Datatypes - chair's ruling on part 4 [was proposal to close issue 5.8 datatypes]
- Re: ISSUE: justifications (postponed)
- Guide: Current version
- Jan ftf agenda thoughts?
- RE: OWL Lite semantics
- ADMIN: Agenda for December 12 telecon
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Datatypes - chair's ruling on part 4 [was proposal to close issue 5.8 datatypes]
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
Tuesday, 10 December 2002
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: Guide comments
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics (fwd)
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
Monday, 9 December 2002
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- Re: ISSUE 5.14 Closing Text
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- ISSUE 5.14 Closing Text
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: SEM: rdfs:subPropertyOf cases
Sunday, 8 December 2002
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- Re: SEM: rdfs:subPropertyOf cases
- TEST: making use of EARL
- Re: SEM: rdfs:subPropertyOf cases
- SEM: rdfs:subPropertyOf cases
Saturday, 7 December 2002
- ADMIN: Manchester face to face RSVPs
- Re: Timeline - editorial issues with docs - implementation
- Re: irc log for 5th December?
- irc log for 5th December?
Friday, 6 December 2002
- Issue 5.13 mediatypes: Proposal to CLOSE
- Re: OWL Lite semantics
- RE: Sketch: reasoning conformance levels (was RE: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite)
- OWL Lite semantics
- Re: question about imports
- RE: Guide comments
- Re: question about imports
- Guide comments
- Re: ISSUE 5.14: Revised proposal to close ontology versioning
- Timeline - editorial issues with docs - implementation
- Re: question about imports
- Re: question about imports
Thursday, 5 December 2002
- Re: question about imports
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- Re: question about imports
- Re: question about imports
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- Re: question about imports
- Re: Issue: Add hasValue to OWL Lite
- question about imports
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- regrets for 5.12.
- Regrets
- ADMIN: Minutes from Nov 21 meeting
- Re: ISSUE 5.19 proposal to resolve
- Potential and/or partial regrets for Dec 5.
- Regrets for Dec. 5th
- Regrets Dec. 5
- Regrets dec. 5
Wednesday, 4 December 2002
- Re: Potential regrets for Dec 5th
- TEST: owl:allDifferent
- Potential regrets for Dec 5th
- Regrets for Dec 5th ( possible ) & 12th ( definite )
- Introduction: Sean Bechhofer
- Regrets for 5th Dec
- ADMIN: Guests for January f2f - suggestions sought
- WOWG: agenda Dec 5 telecon
- regrets Dec. 5
Tuesday, 3 December 2002
- Re: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- OWL Ontology for XML Infoset?
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- Re: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- Re: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- regrets Dec. 12
- Re: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- Re: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- [Fwd: Re: ISSUE 5.14: Revised proposal to close ontology versioning]
- Re: ISSUE 5.14: Revised proposal to close ontology versioning
- Re: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
- Re: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14)
Monday, 2 December 2002
- Re: ISSUE 5.14: Revised proposal to close ontology versioning
- ISSUE 5.14: Revised proposal to close ontology versioning