- From: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:00:38 -0400
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Jeremey, et al, This may happen, but let's hold off on canceling the request until more of us have had a chance to think about this and check Pat's document. Personally, I'm not completely convinced that we can completely avoid dark triples, though my current understanding of Pat's document certainly drastically reduces the places they might be needed. I don't know about the others in the apparently quite small group of people who've actually read it, but I haven't gone through Pat's update carefully enough yet to be convinced it is the case. I'll need about a week, again I don't know about others. -Chris Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr. Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA Voice: +1 914.784.7055, IBM T/L: 863.7055 Fax: +1 914.784.6078, Email: welty@us.ibm.com "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com> Sent by: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org 08/29/2002 01:56 PM To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org> cc: Subject: SEM: No dark triples At the telecon I heard Pat say that we don't need dark triples. Since RDF Core currently has a request from WebOnt to provide dark triples, and that this will delay their work, I propose that we action the chair to cancel the request. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 15:01:19 UTC