W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Re: third version of semantics document

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:38:05 -0400
Message-Id: <p05111705b992f2db1f4c@[]>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, phayes@ai.uwf.edu
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

At 10:48 AM -0400 8/28/02, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>As an indication of how things can go wrong in a complicated specification,
>Pat's document is very close to implying that all RDFS classes and
>properties are OWL objects.



Peter, for those of us who are not as logically inclined as you, 
could you make it clear why the above would be a problem and what the 
consequences would be? If someone asked me "Should RDFS classes and 
properties be OWL objects" I would have assumed the answer should be 

Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 21:54:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:33 UTC