- From: Nick Gibbins <nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:37:59 +0100
- To: WebOnt Working Group <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu> writes: > To the best of my recollection, the discussion of the precise > differences between daml:class and rdfs:class, which seems to carry > over into our current decision-making and issues, was discussed in > the DAML joint committee, and not really in this WG I think that we might have a related issue with the relation between rdfs:Resource and owl:Thing. Is rdfs:Resource a subclass of owl:Thing or vice versa, or are they the same? This probably should be added to Issue 5.20 [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.20-should-OWL-provide-synonyms-for-RDF-and-RDFS-objects -- Nick Gibbins nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk IAM (Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia) tel: +44 (0) 23 80592831 Electronics and Computer Science fax: +44 (0) 23 80592865 University of Southampton
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 09:38:05 UTC