www-webont-wg@w3.org from August 2002 by date

Saturday, 31 August 2002

• Re: third version of semantics document Jos De_Roo

Friday, 30 August 2002

• WOWG: Fwd: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" Jim Hendler
• Re: How to do it/Tricks of the trade for closed world reasoning Jeff Heflin
• Re: How to do it/Tricks of the trade for closed world reasoning Jeff Heflin
• WOWG: Happy Birthday DAML... Jim Hendler
• Re: GUIDE: Syntax query re parseType= Jeff Heflin
• AW: pls vote (or abstain) on 5th ftf location by Weds, 4Sep Raphael Volz
• RE: pls vote (or abstain) on 5th ftf location by Weds, 4Sep Jonathan Dale
• RE: pls vote (or abstain) on 5th ftf location by Weds, 4Sep Dan Connolly
• RE: pls vote (or abstain) on 5th ftf location by Weds, 4Sep Jonathan Dale
• RE: GUIDE: Syntax query re parseType= Dan Connolly
• pls vote (or abstain) on 5th ftf location by Weds, 4Sep Dan Connolly
• Re: third version of semantics document Jos De_Roo
• Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 29 August 2002

• Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval Jos De_Roo
• Re: GUIDE: Syntax query re parseType= Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: SEM: No dark triples Christopher Welty
• Re: SEM: No dark triples Jim Hendler
• RE: GUIDE: Syntax query re parseType= Smith, Michael K
• SEM: No dark triples Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• 5th f2f location Christopher Welty
• REGRETS: August 29th, 2002 Ziv Hellman
• Re: GUIDE: Syntax query re parseType= Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• GUIDE: Syntax query re parseType= Smith, Michael K
• Re: yet another non-entailment Jeremy Carroll
• Re: 5th and 6th f2f locations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Issue 5.22 owl:Class was Re: third version of semantics document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: third version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• SEM: Reaching consensus (was Re: third version of semantics document) Jim Hendler
• Re: Location of the 5th f2f Frank van Harmelen
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics August 29th, 2002 Frank van Harmelen
• Re: third version of semantics document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: status of http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: status of http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ Jeremy Carroll
• Re: third version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time Deborah McGuinness
• Re: proposals for the underlying principles of OWL Dan Connolly
• Re: 5th and 6th f2f locations Deborah McGuinness
• Re: third version of semantics document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: proposals for the underlying principles of OWL Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 28 August 2002

• Re: third version of semantics document Jim Hendler

Thursday, 29 August 2002

• How to do it/Tricks of the trade for closed world reasoning Deborah McGuinness

Wednesday, 28 August 2002

• Re: proposals for the underlying principles of OWL Christopher Welty
• WOWG: Public comments on draft documents Jim Hendler
• ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics August 29th, 2002 Jim Hendler
• Re: proposals for the underlying principles of OWL Jos De_Roo
• 5th and 6th f2f locations Christopher Welty
• Re: proposals for the underlying principles of OWL Dan Connolly
• proposals for the underlying principles of OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Location of the 5th f2f Jeremy Carroll
• Re: third version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Location of the 5th f2f Christopher Welty
• Re: third version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ADMIN: Agenda delay Jim Hendler
• Re: ftf 5 in Manchester Frank van Harmelen
• Re: third version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• third version of semantics document pat hayes

Tuesday, 27 August 2002

• Re: ftf 5 in Manchester Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ftf 5 in Manchester Ian Horrocks
• Re: yet another non-entailment Jim Hendler
• semantics, delay, apologies pat hayes
• Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time Dan Connolly
• ADMIN: tips for scribes: clear link to previous minutes Dan Connolly
• Re: status of http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: status of http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ Dan Connolly
• Re: status of http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: yet another non-entailment Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: yet another non-entailment Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval Jeremy Carroll
• Re: yet another non-entailment Jeremy Carroll
• Re: yet another non-entailment Jeremy Carroll
• Re: yet another non-entailment Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: yet another non-entailment Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: What is a test (was Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: status of http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ (Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: language comparison/discussion (was Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time) Frank van Harmelen
• TEST: What is a test (was Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• status of http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ (Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: SEM: "natural" entailments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: yet another non-entailment Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: yet another non-entailment (was Re: another revision of semantics document) Jeremy Carroll
• 手錶也可以換現金哦~ time@w3.org
• language comparison/discussion (was Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time) Mike Dean
• TEST/SEM: FunctionalProperty, domain-of-discourse Jeremy Carroll
• TEST - completed action Jeremy Carroll
• SEM: "natural" entailments Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 26 August 2002

• Re: revised version of semantics document Jos De_Roo

Saturday, 24 August 2002

• Re: revised version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: revised version of semantics document Jos De_Roo

Friday, 23 August 2002

• Re: revised version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time Deborah McGuinness
• Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time Ian Horrocks
• Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time Deborah McGuinness
• GUIDE: wine-region example Guus Schreiber
• Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time Jim Hendler

Thursday, 22 August 2002

• Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time Deborah McGuinness
• a dark triples solution for OWL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: location/dates ftf 5&6 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: location/dates ftf 5&6 Dan Connolly
• Re: WOWG: location/dates ftf 5&6 Christopher Welty
• RE: WOWG: agenda Aug 22 telecon - apologies Stephen Buswell
• ACTION Volz: Make large ontology available Raphael Volz
• Re: WOWG: location/dates ftf 5&6 Lassila Ora (NRC/Boston)
• Re: WOWG: location/dates ftf 5&6 Deborah McGuinness
• sorry for the late email Deborah McGuinness
• no problem (was Re: problems with abstract syntax document) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [www-webont-wg] <none> Yanosy John-QJY000
• WOWG: location/dates ftf 5&6 Guus Schreiber
• Re: another revision of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Regrets Aug 22 telecon David Trastour
• problems with abstract syntax document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: yet another non-entailment (was Re: another revision of semantics document) Ian Horrocks
• A use for 2 model theories?? was: Re: revised version of semantics document Jonathan Borden
• regarding location Christopher Welty
• Re: revised version of semantics document Jos De_Roo
• Re: revised version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: revised version of semantics document Jos De_Roo
• regrets Aug 22 telecon herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: revised version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: class 'discovery' was Re: revised version of semantics document Jos De_Roo
• class 'discovery' was Re: revised version of semantics document Jonathan Borden
• Re: revised version of semantics document Jos De_Roo
• Re: revised version of semantics document Jos De_Roo
• Re: revised version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: revised version of semantics document Jos De_Roo

Wednesday, 21 August 2002

• Re: yet another non-entailment (was Re: another revision of semantics document) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: yet another non-entailment (was Re: another revision of semantics document) Jonathan Borden
• regrets: 8/29 telecon Evan Wallace
• Re: yet another non-entailment (was Re: another revision of semantics document) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: yet another non-entailment (was Re: another revision of semantics document) Jonathan Borden
• regrets: 8/22 telecon Leo Obrst
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 22 telecon Lynn Andrea Stein
• yet another non-entailment (was Re: another revision of semantics document) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• 5th f2f vote Christopher Welty
• Re: ADMIN: [Fwd: WebOnt f2f hotel] Deborah McGuinness
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 22 telecon Mike Dean
• WOWG: agenda Aug 22 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: another revision of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ADMIN: [Fwd: WebOnt f2f hotel] Guus Schreiber
• another revision of semantics document pat hayes

Tuesday, 20 August 2002

• Re: revised version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: revised version of semantics document Ian Horrocks
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Frank van Harmelen
• Re: revised version of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• revised version of semantics document pat hayes

Monday, 19 August 2002

• Re: early incomplete draft of semantics document Jos De_Roo
• Re: early incomplete draft of semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• early incomplete draft of semantics document pat hayes
• Re: SEM: Datalog Leo Obrst
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Dan Brickley

Thursday, 15 August 2002

• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon pat hayes
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon pat hayes

Monday, 19 August 2002

• Re: SEM: Datalog Raphael Volz

Friday, 16 August 2002

• Re: OWL semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Jos De_Roo
• SWAD-Europe Semantic Web calendaring workshop 2002-10-09, Bristol, UK (fwd) Libby Miller

Thursday, 15 August 2002

• GUIDE: from "controlled vocabularies" to ontologies Frank van Harmelen
• Log of Aug 15 telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: 15th August Regrets Libby Miller
• Re: comments on issue 5.19 (classes as instances) and 4.6 (equivalentTo) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: GUIDE: draft format how-to-do-it examples Dan Connolly
• Re: GUIDE: draft format how-to-do-it examples Deborah McGuinness
• Re: comments on issue 5.19 (classes as instances) and 4.6 (equivalentTo) pat hayes
• Re: comments on issue 5.19 (classes as instances) and 4.6 (equivalentTo) pat hayes
• SEM: Datalog Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL semantics Dan Connolly
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Deborah McGuinness
• 15th August Regrets Jonathan Dale
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Jonathan Borden
• SEM: owl:Class vs. rdfs:Class was: Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Jonathan Borden
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Frank van Harmelen
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Nick Gibbins
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL semantics Ian Horrocks
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Jim Hendler
• regrets, 8/15/02 Leo Obrst
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Ian Horrocks
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Frank van Harmelen
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Jos De_Roo
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 14 August 2002

• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Jos De_Roo
• RE: GUIDE: Dumb question re namespaces. Smith, Michael K
• Re: summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Dan Connolly
• summary of current position with respect to semantics proposals (was Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• regrets for next several weeks Jonathan Borden
• Re: OWL semantics Dan Connolly
• Re: GUIDE: Dumb question re namespaces. Jonathan Borden
• Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Frank van Harmelen
• regets [was: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon] Jos De_Roo
• WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: GUIDE: Dumb question re namespaces. Jos De_Roo

Tuesday, 13 August 2002

• GUIDE: Dumb question re namespaces. Smith, Michael K
• TEST: DAML+OIL to OWL converter (p.s. to SEM) Jim Hendler
• WOWG: kudos to Deb/Frank Jim Hendler
• Face to face 5 location vote Jim Hendler

Monday, 12 August 2002

• Writeups on XML Schema datatypes Frank van Harmelen

Saturday, 10 August 2002

• RE: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Jos De_Roo

Friday, 9 August 2002

• Re: OWL semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 10 August 2002

• RE: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Dan Connolly

Friday, 9 August 2002

• RE: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Smith, Michael K
• Re: OWL semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL semantics Jeff Heflin
• Regrets for 8/15 telecon Jeff Heflin
• Re: SEM: integration with RDF MT Ian Horrocks
• Re: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1 Jos De_Roo
• Re: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Jos De_Roo
• SEM: integration with RDF MT Jonathan Borden

Thursday, 8 August 2002

• SemWeb intro Frank van Harmelen
• Re: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Christopher Welty
• Re: OWL semantics Ian Horrocks
• SEM: Going forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 7 August 2002

• RE: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Smith, Michael K
• SEM: Let's make this productive Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 6 August 2002

• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Leo Obrst
• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Christopher Welty
• Re: OWL semantics Leo Obrst
• Re: SEMANTICS - we need them NOW Leo Obrst
• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Deborah McGuinness
• Re: "Definition" of Ontology Christopher Welty
• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Deborah McGuinness
• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: "Definition" of Ontology Jonathan Borden
• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Christopher Welty
• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: "Definition" of Ontology Leo Obrst
• Re: OWL semantics ( with focus on an axiomatization) Deborah McGuinness
• "Definition" of Ontology Christopher Welty
• Re: OWL semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL semantics Christopher Welty
• Re: OWL semantics Christopher Welty
• Re: OWL semantics Dieter Fensel
• Re: OWL semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL semantics Ian Horrocks
• Re: SEMANTICS - we need them NOW Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL semantics Jos De_Roo

Monday, 5 August 2002

• OWL semantics Ian Horrocks
• Re: SEMANTICS - we need them NOW Dan Connolly
• GUIDE: Report on OMG activities related to Presentation Syntax for UML Evan Wallace
• SEMANTICS - we need them NOW Ian Horrocks

Friday, 2 August 2002

• Re: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1 Jos De_Roo
• Regrets for next three weeks Jeremy Carroll
• LANG: Fwd: URI of "this" ontology Jim Hendler
• Re: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Jonathan Borden
• Re: SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Dan Connolly
• SEM/GUIDE: subclasses of classes of Properties? (5.3) Dan Connolly

Thursday, 1 August 2002

• Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1 Ian Horrocks
• WOWG: article on document release Jim Hendler
• delay in semantics activities (was Re: ADMIN: Teleconference Minutes for August 1, 2002.) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL feature synopsis, reference, abstract syntax released as W3C WDs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1 Jos De_Roo
• RE: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Jonathan Dale
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Deborah McGuinness
• Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Dan Connolly
• ADMIN: Teleconference Minutes for August 1, 2002. Smith, Michael K
• regrets for 2002-08-01 telecon Libby Miller
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Mike Dean
• Aug 1 regrets Jonathan Borden
• ADMIN: cancel regrets for August 1 telecon Smith, Michael K
• Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1 Ian Horrocks
• ADMIN: regrets for August 1 telecon Smith, Michael K
• regrets for 8/1 Christopher Welty
• Re: WOWG: Working Drafts Published Evan Wallace
• WOWG: Working Drafts Published Jim Hendler
• Re: ADMIN: Updated Minutes of July 25 Telecon Ian Horrocks
• Re: Minutes of July 25 Telecon Ian Horrocks
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Bristol f2f local info page Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Jos De_Roo
• Regrets for 1 Aug 2002 telcon Nick Gibbins
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: comments on issue 5.19 (classes as instances) and 4.6 (equivalentTo) Jos De_Roo
• Re: TEST: Manifest files Jos De_Roo
• Regrets for 8/1 telecon Thompson, Lynne R

Last message date: Saturday, 31 August 2002 12:47:05 UTC