W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2001

Re: NAME: SWOL versus WOL

From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 20:29:49 +0100
Message-ID: <3C2B76AD.F456C85C@cs.vu.nl>
To: WOL <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

Ziv Hellman wrote:
> 
> OWL is excellent.
> 
> One man's opinion: Let's go for that.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Ziv


It would certainly have my backing too,
for all the reasons outlined in Tim's message. 

Frank.
   ----

Received on Thursday, 27 December 2001 14:30:32 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ian Horrocks: "Re: How to capture modeling information in WOL"
Previous message: Ziv Hellman: "RE: NAME: SWOL versus WOL"
In reply to: Ziv Hellman: "RE: NAME: SWOL versus WOL"
Next in thread: Leo Obrst: "Re: NAME: SWOL versus WOL"
Reply: Leo Obrst: "Re: NAME: SWOL versus WOL"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:25 UTC