Re: more on the relationship between RDF and DAML+OIL

On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 06:36, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Here is a more-formal discussion of the problems that would arise if
> DAML+OIL syntax was treated the same way that the RDF model theory treats
> RDF syntax.

I'm not sure I understand this argument. Could you show how
it applies to the axiomatic semantics of DAML+OIL?


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2001 12:21:34 UTC