W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2001


From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 10:41:14 +0100
Message-ID: <3C11E03A.49639C05@cs.vu.nl>
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Summary: DAML+OIL is built on RDF, not XML.
> [...]
> A DAML ontology written in N3 or N-triple is still a DAML ontology.
> This is in contrast with other RDF dialects such as RSS [7] or CC/PP [8]
> where many implementations assume a rigid XML document format, with no
> variation from the examples in the specs.


While not wanting to take away from Peter's list of caveat's (which are all justified), your conclusion is correct: DAML+OIL does not make any assumption about which particular serialisation of RDF is used (in XML or otherwise, or in one XML form or the other). 

Also, I share your conclusion that this is how our new language should be. 

Received on Saturday, 8 December 2001 04:41:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:25 UTC