Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Summary: DAML+OIL is built on RDF, not XML. > [...] > A DAML ontology written in N3 or N-triple is still a DAML ontology. > > This is in contrast with other RDF dialects such as RSS [7] or CC/PP [8] > where many implementations assume a rigid XML document format, with no > variation from the examples in the specs. Jeremy, While not wanting to take away from Peter's list of caveat's (which are all justified), your conclusion is correct: DAML+OIL does not make any assumption about which particular serialisation of RDF is used (in XML or otherwise, or in one XML form or the other). Also, I share your conclusion that this is how our new language should be. Frank. ----Received on Saturday, 8 December 2001 04:41:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:25 UTC