- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:47:52 +0100
- To: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
- CC: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Javier Godoy wrote: > > Yes, it is an elegant solution because it is unambiguous and it is quite > diffent from positional operand-* elements, making clear that it applies to > the element as a whole. The new wording in section 5.19.8 seems OK for me. > > Note that text below the example in 5.19.9 should be modified. Currently it > says "Of the optional DAV operators, DAV:is-defined and DAV:like are > supported". DAV:contains was added in the latest revision. Yep. And, as a matter of fact, DAV:is-defined was made required long ago. > Besides, I think the attribute declaration in section 5.19.1 must include > an attribute default, for conformance with W3C REC-xml-20060816 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#attdecls > > <!ATTLIST opdesc allow-pcdata (yes|no) "no" > Good catch. We have that in more places. I prefer to make it #IMPLIED though, as this avoids having the XML Infoset depend on whether the parser used validation or not. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 11 February 2008 12:48:11 UTC