- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:55:37 +0100
- To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Elias Sinderson wrote: > > What needs to be clarified is the relative ordering of evaluating > include and exclude elements of a DASL request. Whereas AND operations > are generally unaffected by the order of their evaluation, this fails to > hold when you AND together set operations (union, intersection, and the > like). If you would like me to provide an example of why this is the > case, I'd be happy to... Elias, I think the rules we're defining do not depend on evaluation order. Rephrasing Martin's definition with set arithmetics: 1) res = all 2) res = all - excluded 3) res = included 4) res = included - excluded Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 05:55:39 UTC