- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:09:27 -0800
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "'Wallmer, Martin'" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>, "'Kevin Wiggen'" <kwiggen@xythos.com>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
> > Why have an architectural principle that holds us back, if > it doesn't > > give us something in return? > > It does. For instance, it allows us to define how locks and multiple > bindings interact in a logical way. This is exactly what I'm looking to understand, that I don't currently understand. In fact, I thought that the interaction of locks and multiple bindings was problematic. So how does this make them work together in a logical way? Lisa
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 16:09:44 UTC