Re: "URI properties", Was: SEARCH for displayname

Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> I do plan to raise these issues more generally for bind.  However, I 
> have also raised them in the past and they do not show up on your list.

Well, the please re-raise them with a pointer to the original mail on 
the mailing list.

> Sorry if my replies are brief to the point of bluntness; I'm trying 
> to do a bunch of IETF coordination and cross-group work this week and
> attend other WG meetings at the same time.  I will try to understand
> the context in which you're saying how things are and must behave.

Good.

> In return, please respect that I am challenging the model assumptions
> I see developing here and in bind discussions.  I hope it's not too
> late for us to have open minds about how things are defined.

The model for BIND has been developed in 1999 and has never changed since.

Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 11:00:03 UTC