RE: discovery of search arbiters, was: Comments on search-00 draft from Lisa Dusseault on 2002-03-29 (www-webdav-dasl@w3.org from January to March 2002)

From: Lisa Dusseault <ldusseault@xythos.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:33:28 -0800
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00f501c1d747$d7e0ac40$7801a8c0@moose>

> However, AFAIK in *current* implementations *each* WebDAV
> research can act
> as a SEARCH arbiter. In which case the discovery is trivial
> (just look at
> DAV:supported-search-grammar or DAV:supported-method-set).

This is part of my point.  If in all current implementations, every WebDAV
collection (resource?) can act as an arbiter, why not require that for
basicsearch support?  Is there some prospective SEARCH implementation that
couldn't handle that?

lisa

Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 12:32:26 UTC