- From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:30:13 -0800
- To: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
At 02:11 AM 3/13/2002 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote: >We still need to decide whether we want a standard way to discover search >arbiters that *are* known for a particular resource. I'd say as long it's >optional and the list doesn't need to be exhaustive, it won't hurt. I think it's out of scope, but if you propose something that is cheap, optional, and non-controversial, it's okay. The risk is that you will propose something controversial, and then pay the price of another two weeks of delay getting concensus. That's the only risk I think. it's your call. I do not object.
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 20:30:49 UTC