RE: QSD

> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Davis
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 7:51 AM
> To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: QSD
> 
> ...
> 
> You are right to observe that QSD for basicsearch does  not do this.
> I think that's okay.  basic search is, well, basic, and so is 
> QSD.  I think
> it would be okay to release DASL with QSD as it is, that is, 
> without making
> it any more powerful.

Again: this is not true for the current draft.

Received on Sunday, 27 January 2002 05:45:30 UTC