At 01:14 PM 6/24/2002 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: >Hi, > >does anybody remember the reason why DAV:isdefined is an *optional* >operator? > >Julian I don't remember, and a search of the archived mail http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=www-webdav-dasl does not show anything either. So I can only guess: either someone objected (verbally) that it was expensive to implement or it was a mistake. Are you asking from curiousity, or do you want to propose that it be mandatory?Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 11:46:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:12 UTC