Re: Rationale for DAV:isdefined to be optional

At 01:14 PM 6/24/2002 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:

>does anybody remember the reason why DAV:isdefined is an *optional*

I don't remember, and a search of the archived mail
does not show anything either.

So I can only guess: either someone objected (verbally) that it was 
expensive to implement or it was a mistake.

Are you asking from curiousity, or do you want to propose that it be mandatory?

Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 11:46:20 UTC