RE: JW12: relative URI's

I was originally proposing that we not allow relative URIs.  Since a search
arbiter might actually be part of, or nearby to the search scope, it's
probably OK to allow relative URLs.  The specification should be clear what
the base URI is for their calculation, though.

- Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Babich, Alan
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 3:44 PM
> To: 'DASL'
> Subject: JW12: relative URI's
>
>
> Jim W.: Are you proposing we drop relative URI's, or are you
> just making a comment?
>
> Alan Babich
>

Received on Monday, 16 August 1999 20:15:42 UTC