- From: Saveen Reddy (Exchange) <saveenr@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 01:13:22 -0800
- To: "'Rick Henderson'" <rickh@netscape.com>, "'www-webdav-dasl@w3.org'" <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Rick, Let me make sure I understand you correctly. Is your position that DASL is orthogonal to the WEBDAV protocol -- other than picking up the document and property model? If so, then I think I agree to some degree (maybe a large degree). However, I'm not clear on why this relationship unnecessarily narrows the scope. Could you elaborate on the scenarios that you think are interesting here but that the charter might consider out of scope? This would help clear it up for me. Thanks, -Saveen -----Original Message----- From: Rick Henderson [mailto:rickh@netscape.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 1998 4:26 PM To: 'www-webdav-dasl@w3.org' Subject: Scope of DASL Charter It seems to me we are unnecessarily narrowing our scope. Search is already a common thing while distributed authoring is a rarer more fancy thing. It seems wrong to define a search protocol that only works on servers that have all that distributed authoring stuff. DAV has lots of things in it that aren't at all necessary for searching. like PROPPATCH, MKCOL, ADDREF, DELREF, LOCKING. There is no need to be able to do document management operations to do search. As part of the protocol spec we should probably define a subset of DAV that is necessary for DASL. This might be only the underlying document model. --Rick ************************************************* Rick Henderson (Netscape)(650)937-3152 rickh@netscape.com *************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 1998 04:11:53 UTC