- From: Saveen Reddy (Exchange) <saveenr@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 20:41:18 -0700
- To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Yes I sent some private mail on this ... the upshot: using ANY is a false economy. It's a simpler DTD but really hides a lot of ambiguity. Avoiding its use does make the grammar (and its description) more understandable and if done as correctly (see her mail showing what this might look like) will not make the grammar unwieldy. -Saveen -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@parc.xerox.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 1998 6:36 PM To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org Subject: RE: ANY in the DASL spec Just checking, but did we reach agreement (at least between Saveen and Judy) to make the grammer specific where possible (e.g. not use ANY where prop will do), etc? I believe the last message I saw (from Saveen) indicated that Judy had persuaded him. I want to make sure that's right, and test whether there are any others lurking who object, or perhaps all are now convinced?
Received on Thursday, 7 May 1998 23:41:18 UTC