Re: use of boolean literals

OK, I'm all for sticking to the smallest set of functionality that would
still be useful.

At 04:49 PM 4/23/98 PDT, Rick Henderson wrote:
>Yes we're talking about the same distinction.  Full text search engines don't
>in general support that sort of query directly.  There are tricks though that
>would
>make it reasonable to support if it were essential.  It doesn't happen
>naturally
>the way it would when implementing using an RDBMS.
>
>I'm inclined to say anyway that the distinction is not essential.  DASL need
>not call out the distinction in the query language.  It's another feature to
>implement and why is it important?
>
>--Rick
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> Name:                   Judith A. Slein
>> E-Mail:         slein@wrc.xerox.com
>> Internal Phone:         8*222-5169
>> Fax:                    (716) 422-2938
>> MailStop:               105-50C
>> Web Site:    http://www.nde.wrc.xerox.com/users/Slein/slein.htm
>
>
>
>--
>*************************************************
>Rick Henderson            (Netscape)(650)937-3152
>rickh@netscape.com
>*************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
Name:			Judith A. Slein
E-Mail:		slein@wrc.xerox.com
Internal Phone:  	8*222-5169
Fax:			(716) 422-2938
MailStop:		105-50C
Web Site:    http://www.nde.wrc.xerox.com/users/Slein/slein.htm

Received on Friday, 24 April 1998 18:21:36 UTC