- From: Saveen Reddy (Exchange) <saveenr@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 14:00:37 -0700
- To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
I would say tht HTTP/1.1 defines them but only within the context of content-negotiation -- authoring is less clear. How does one upload a german language variant of a text that alreadt exist? It's even less clear how this affects a search (beyond the fact that certain HTTP headers are now exposed as DAV properties). The further complication is that, as I understand it, versioning and variants will use the same model on WEBDAV (this is based on comments I heard at the LA IETF). We would need to have the DAV models for both before we can address them in DASL. -Saveen -----Original Message----- From: Judith Slein [mailto:slein@wrc.xerox.com] Sent: Friday, April 17, 1998 12:39 PM To: Jim Davis Cc: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org Subject: Re: no Versioning or Variants HTTP 1.1 defines enough about variants that I think we need to consider them. Section 12 on content negotiation, together with the Accept, Accept-Charset, Accept-Encoding, and Accept-Language make it clear that a single resource may be available in different variants that could certainly be relevant to search. Do I want you to search all variants or just the English language variants or just the French language variants for the word "chat"? At 04:01 PM 4/16/98 PDT, Jim Davis wrote: >As I recall, at the IETF BOF we agreed to remove any mention of versioning >or variants from the DASL spec until such time as the WebDAV protocol (or >some other relevant protocol) defines them. > > > Name: Judith A. Slein E-Mail: slein@wrc.xerox.com Internal Phone: 8*222-5169 Fax: (716) 422-2938 MailStop: 105-50C Web Site: http://www.nde.wrc.xerox.com/users/Slein/slein.htm
Received on Monday, 20 April 1998 17:00:30 UTC