- From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 10:40:45 PDT
- To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
The draft in secton 8.7.5 uses lowercase t and f as representations for boolean values. I don't like these much. What would be better? First I ask, does any other HTTP protocol already define a string representation for boolean values, e.g. I recall seeing upper case T and F in DAV, but I think it's gone now. If there is already a precedent we should follow it. Actually I think it likely that we will need to define a tag that represents the "unknown" value (so that we can construct searches for properties with unknown values), we may as well define tags for True and False, too. In that case we should be these tags in 8.7.5 as well. But see also my note about the casesensitive tag. I realize that, conceptually, one could distinguish between boolean values in the context of a search filter expression, and boolean values that are just controlling options such as case sensitivity, but it's not clear to me that making this distintinction wouldn't add confusion to the spec, as in "why is 'true' written as 'T' here and as '<DAV:TRUE/>' there?"
Received on Thursday, 16 April 1998 13:43:01 UTC