W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2018

Proposed erratum for SCXML

From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:18:39 -0400
To: www-voice@w3.org
Message-ID: <5e424a56-bcb4-3fea-2da8-ce4407949d36@gmail.com>
I propose adding the entry below to the SCXML Errata document. Please 
send any comments to this list.

-  Jim

Section 3.10.2 Remove mention of atomic states from description of deep 
history state.

The final sentence in the first paragraph of 3.10.2 should read:

(Note that under the definition of a legal state specification, if the 
parent of the history element is <state> and the default state 
specification contains a multiple states, then, in a conformant SCXML 
document, the 'type' of the history element /MUST/ be "deep" and the 
states /MUST/ be descendants of a <parallel> element that is itself a 
descendant of the parent <state> element.)

Remove the reference to atomic states.  The definition of legal state 
specification does not require that the default state specification of a 
deep history state contain only atomic states.
Received on Monday, 24 September 2018 12:19:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:05 UTC