Proposed erratum for SCXML

I propose adding the entry below to the SCXML Errata document. Please 
send any comments to this list.

-  Jim

Section 3.10.2 Remove mention of atomic states from description of deep 
history state.

The final sentence in the first paragraph of 3.10.2 should read:

(Note that under the definition of a legal state specification, if the 
parent of the history element is <state> and the default state 
specification contains a multiple states, then, in a conformant SCXML 
document, the 'type' of the history element /MUST/ be "deep" and the 
states /MUST/ be descendants of a <parallel> element that is itself a 
descendant of the parent <state> element.)

Remove the reference to atomic states.  The definition of legal state 
specification does not require that the default state specification of a 
deep history state contain only atomic states.

Received on Monday, 24 September 2018 12:19:04 UTC