Re: Hidden anchors in SCXML specification - can I refer to them?

Those anchors are artifacts of the spec-generation script we use, and I 
have no idea how stable they have been across drafts.  However the SCXML 
1.0 Recommendation document will not be modified once it is published, 
so it would be safe to refer to anchors in it.

  If we do an SCXML 1.1 or 2.0, it will be a completely different 
document and any part of the 1.0 specification may be modified or removed.

- Jim

On 7/16/2015 5:28 AM, Stefan Radomski wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I implemented some more functions to validate a given SCXML document 
> and would like to refer to the specific paragraphs when complaining 
> about violations at runtime. I see that there are quite a few anchors 
> available in the actual SCXML recommendation that are not linked but 
> would be available to refer to per URL fragment, e.g. 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#N10AD3. Can I expect these to be 
> consistent among releases of the standard?
>
> Best regards
> Stefan