- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:54:41 -0500
- To: www-voice@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 14:55:15 UTC
You're right. In the second invocation the final state is subFinal2. I've fixed this. - Jim On 11/25/2014 7:15 AM, Stefan Radomski wrote: > Hi there, > > in test240.txml for SCXML, there are two nested invokers. The second > one references a target state “subfinal1” in a transition, which is > only defined in the first invoker: > <transition target="subFinal1”> > I am pretty sure that this is an oversight? > Stefan
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 14:55:15 UTC