Re: Spec column in SCXML IRP table

Just to be clear: it’s not only the manifest.xml but the “Spec” column in the table on the HTML page as well.

Sorry to nitpick
  Stefan

On Nov 11, 2014, at 15:37, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ah, yes, you're right.  I forgot to edit the manifest.xml.  It should be fixed now.
> 
> - Jim
> On 11/11/2014 6:37 AM, Stefan Radomski wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2014, at 13:58, Jim Barnett <jim.barnett@genesys.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, that's because I moved the algorithm later in the Appendices. It is now Appendix D, while it was A before.  So all Appendices  before D have moved up a letter.
>>> 
>> I am sure that’s true, nevertheless, this makes the “Spec” column in the IRP table incorrect for quite a few tests :)
>> 
>> E.g. test436.txml is not testing a functional requirement from C.1 as indicated in the table and the manifest from the IRP page, but from B.1. It’s no big deal, the references still point to the correct section as the anchors are still correct, however, the section these anchors appear under are not correctly labeled.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Stefan
>> 
>>> - Jim
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Stefan Radomski [mailto:radomski@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de]
>>> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 3:24 AM
>>> To: www-voice@w3.org (www-voice@w3.org)
>>> Subject: Spec column in SCXML IRP table
>>> 
>>> Hey there,
>>> 
>>> Datamodels and IO Processors are shifted by one alphabet character in the "Spec" column on the IRP page. Datamodels are "B", not "C" and IO processors are "C", not "D".
>>> Stefan
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 15:34:53 UTC