- From: Ate Douma <ate@douma.nu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 03:08:09 +0100
- To: "www-voice@w3.org (www-voice@w3.org)" <www-voice@w3.org>
Hi, I just noticed this with the IRP test579 and test580. Both these tests define transitions with conditions conf:idVal="1==0" or conf:idVal="1==1". When transformed with the confXPath.xsl stylesheet this leads to invalid xpath syntax cond="$Var1/text() ==0" or cond="$Var1/text() ==1" Seems unlikely to me anyone testing these for the xpath datamodel gets them to pass. NB: these tests do produce correct ecmascript syntax when using the confEcma.xsl... After I manually fixed these conditions in the txml to conf:idVal="1=0" and conf:idVal="1=1", both tests work fine and pass in my implementation (for both ecmascript and xpath). So I think these tests should be fixed like this. Thanks, Ate
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 02:08:41 UTC