Re: SCXML test coverage

Thank you, +1 implementations passing test288.


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Fixed.
>
>
> On 7/22/2014 2:04 PM, Zjnue Brzavi wrote:
>
>
>  I've received 3 implementation reports so far, and have posted an
>> updated IR Test plan document showing the results for each test.  We have
>> at least 2 passes for all mandatory tests except test288, which I just
>> added a couple of weeks ago.  If you have already submitted a report, could
>> you consider running 288 and re-submitting?
>>
>
>  Hi,
>  The link to test288.txml seems dead:
> http://www.w3.org/Voice/2013/scxml-irp/288/test288.txml
>  Zjnue
>
>
> --
> Jim Barnett
> Genesys
>