- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:16:10 -0400
- To: Voice List <www-voice@w3.org>
I've received 3 implementation reports so far, and have posted an updated IR Test plan document showing the results for each test. We have at least 2 passes for all mandatory tests except test288, which I just added a couple of weeks ago. If you have already submitted a report, could you consider running 288 and re-submitting? Also, for the ECMA data model, we have two reports, but only one passes tests 446, 569, and 459. If you have an implementation of the ECMA data model and haven't passed those tests, would you consider working on them and then re-submitting? In addition to the reports that we have received so far, three other people have told me that they will submit reports. If all of them do, we will have a strong implementation report and shouldn't have any trouble getting to Recommendation status. (We currently have only one implementation of the BasicHTTP Event I/O processor, but I think that at least two of the people who have yet to submit have implementations of it, so we should be able to keep it in the final specification, if all goes well.) http://www.w3.org/Voice/2013/scxml-irp/ -- Jim Barnett Genesys
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 15:16:44 UTC