- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:52:44 -0400
- To: Voice List <www-voice@w3.org>
I know that there are some implementations that haven't implemented the entire spec. When you come to a test of a feature that you haven't implemented, whether mandatory or optional, you should put "not supported" in the implementation report, rather than reporting that you failed the test. The reason for this is that reporting failure on a test is interpreted to mean that you tried to implement the feature but could not. This would call into question whether the feature in question can be implemented interoperably. If you choose not to implement a feature, that may call its popularity into question, but not its interoperability. -- Jim Barnett Genesys
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 18:53:24 UTC