Re: Suggestions for onentry/onexit tags

Andreas,
   Please let us know if you are satisfied with our response to you 
email.  If we don't hear from you by January 21, we will assume that you 
are and proceed with publishing the next version of the specification.

   Best,
  Jim Barnett

On 1/3/2014 3:58 AM, Andreas Gansen [Masked] wrote:
> Preview: Hey there, We are working on an SCXML-Editor. Between reading
> Safely received through a Masked Email. IF THIS IS SPAM, CLICK HERE TO 
> BLOCK THIS MASKED EMAIL. 
> <https://emails.abine.com/disableDisposable?fwd=FWD_3Xtr0yqS@opayq.com>
>
> Hey there,
>
> We are working on an SCXML-Editor. Between reading the draft and 
> parsing the scxml we noticed that onentry/onexit tags can occur 0 till 
> inf times for a state.
>
> Would it not be better to have 0 or 1 occurrence?
> That would avoid the question: How can I exit a state multiple times 
> without re-enterring before?
> The code from each handler would then be concatenated.
>
> Please note either way:
> The final state 3.7.2 ( http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#final )
>  considers one entry of onentry/onexit tags only.
> While the schema does not:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-core-strict.xsd
>
> Regards,
>
> Andreas

-- 
Jim Barnett
Genesys