- From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:22:17 +0000
- To: Voice Public List <www-voice@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281039BC1@GENSJZMBX02.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
We are about to publish a new Last Call Draft of SCXML. If you submitted comments on the previous draft and have not yet done so, please take a look at the proposed new draft to see if it addresses your issues. If we don't hear from you by the end of this period, we will assume that you accept the proposed new draft and will proceed to publication. As Dan Burnett's email indicated, we are particularly interested in catching problems/bugs at this point. The previous round of comments caught a number of them, and have improved the specification. We will also accept suggestions for improvements/extensions to the specification, but they will most likely be rolled forward for consideration in a future version of the spec. (We keep an internal list of such proposals and I have added David's proposal for sendid to it.) it would require compelling justification and broad consensus to make such modifications now. - Jim http://www.w3.org/Voice/2013/scxml-irp/SCXML.htm http://www.w3.org/Voice/2013/scxml-irp/SCXML_Diff.htm
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 13:22:42 UTC