- From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:30:10 +0000
- To: David Junger <tffy@free.fr>, Voice Public List <www-voice@w3.org>
David, OK, we'll consider the two issues separately. We will discuss your proposal for changing how sendid works. At this point, it's a question of what kinds of changes we're willing to make that aren't bug-related. On the issue of sendid in _event, my sense is that it has a limited, but real, usefulness, and that it doesn't cause any actual problems. Do you disagree? If so, could you explain in more detail what the problem is? Thanks, Jim -----Original Message----- From: David Junger [mailto:tffy@free.fr] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:41 PM To: Voice Public List Subject: Re: sendid Le 17 apr 2013 à 21:15, Jim Barnett a écrit : > Can you clarify the relation between your comment about sendid in _event (at the end of your email), and your proposal for revising sendid? Are the two comments related or independent of each other? Your proposal for sendid is clear, but I don't understand your final comment about the sendid field in _event or its relationship to your main proposal. Sorry. It is mostly unrelated to my proposal. David
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 20:30:39 UTC