- From: David Junger <tffy@free.fr>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:32:53 +0200
- To: Voice Public List <www-voice@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 17:33:21 UTC
Le 5 apr 2013 à 19:18, Jim Barnett a écrit : > So your proposal is that we say that it can be a string or an Object, and if it is “empty”, its value can be anything that evaluates to ‘false’? Can we say the same thing for the string-valued slots? It would be nice to have a consistent way of representing the absence of a value. In the ECMAScript datamodel, type is not important. It's ECMAScript, after all! things have mixed types all the time here. The absence of a value of any type is consistently represented by the special value (and type) 'undefined'. Which does convert to boolean false. David
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 17:33:21 UTC