- From: Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:47:09 -0500
- To: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
- Cc: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>
Sounds good, thank you Jim. Jake On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com> wrote: > Jake, > It looks to me like they have been updated, since the file modified date is ' 26-Jan-2012' for the relevant files. Just to be sure, I'm attaching my local copies of the schema files. I have used these with Xerces without problems. > > - Jim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Beard [mailto:jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:21 PM > To: www-voice > Subject: Re: scxml.xsd fails with xmllint tool > > Hi, > > I was just wondering if the SCXML schema was updated in the latest draft? The current draft links here: > http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml.xsd > > This is the same URL as the one I was testing in my previous message, and my libxml-based validator is failing with the same errors, so it's not clear whether or not the schema has been revised. > > I'd greatly appreciate it if you could let me know. Thanks, > > Jake > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote: >> Sounds good. Thank you, Jim. >> >> Jake >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com> wrote: >>> Jacob, >>> We are about to publish a new draft (next day or two). I have used >>> the schema in this upcoming draft with Xerces without problems (I did >>> get errors when I used the schema from the current public draft, but >>> I don't remember having as many as you report, so there may still be >>> differences between different validators.) I would recommend waiting >>> for the new draft. >>> >>> - Jim >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jacob Beard [mailto:jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca] >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:51 PM >>> To: www-voice >>> Subject: scxml.xsd fails with xmllint tool >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to use the SCXML xsd [0] to validate a very basic SCXML >>> file [1] using the xmllint command line validation tool. xmllint >>> reports the following errors while attempting to parse the SCXML >>> schema: >>> >>> jbeard@jbeard-VirtualBox:~/workspace/scion/src/test/basic$ xmllint >>> --noout --schema http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml.xsd >>> basic0.scxml >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-external.xsd:69: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type 'scxml.send.type': >>> The content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-external.xsd:119: >>> element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type >>> 'scxml.finalize.type': The content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-core.xsd:89: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type 'scxml.scxml.type': >>> The content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-core.xsd:119: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type 'scxml.state.type': >>> The content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-core.xsd:153: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type 'scxml.onentry.type': >>> The content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-core.xsd:168: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type 'scxml.onexit.type': >>> The content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-core.xsd:187: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type >>> 'scxml.transition.type': The content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-core.xsd:214: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type >>> 'scxml.parallel.type': The content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-core.xsd:281: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type 'scxml.if.type': The >>> content model is not determinist. >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-module-core.xsd:340: element >>> complexType: Schemas parser error : complex type 'scxml.foreach.type': >>> The content model is not determinist. >>> WXS schema http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml.xsd failed to >>> compile >>> >>> >>> I was wondering if scxml.xsd is known to work, and if so, whether >>> someone could recommend a validator? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jake >>> >>> [0] http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml.xsd >>> [1] >>> https://github.com/jbeard4/SCION/blob/master/src/test/basic/basic0.sc >>> xml >>> >
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 17:47:55 UTC