- From: Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:02:06 -0400
- To: www-voice@w3.org
- Cc: George Yanev <ygeorge@applicata.bg>, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
Hi George, I can verify that the updated SCXML schema files from Jim worked with xmllint (libxml) and xerces validators. Jake On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com> wrote: > George, > > Try using these schema files, which will be published with the next > draft. I am using them with Xerxes and not having problems with the UPA > rule. > > > > - Jim > > > > From: George Yanev [mailto:ygeorge@applicata.bg] > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:18 PM > To: www-voice@w3.org > Subject: SCXML schemas still don't validate with respect to UPA > > > > Hi Jacob, > > Three months ago there was a discussion about sxcml schemas which don't > validate with respect > > to UPA rule. > > You mentioned about a fix in the new draft but still the schema files are > the same. > > Will there be a new version of the xsd files or we have to find ways to > bypass this rule in validators? > > > > Greetings > > George
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 14:02:57 UTC