issue-677

Paolo,

On June 7 I asked for but never received clarification as to why 
issue-677 was "reject".

I never heard the decision makers comment on the performance impacts of 
line-by-line
processing of ECMA (see 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2010AprJun/0062.html),
nor was any defense offered about why a CCXML <transition> should have 
ECMA variable scoping
that is completely different from normal ECMA processing within CCXML's 
<script> tag
(see 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2010AprJun/att-0055/00-part).

The current state of the recommendation and test cases is as follows:
1) <script> is fed to ECMA all at once and therefore uses normal ECMA 
scoping rules
2) <var> and <if> inside a <transition> are fed line-by-line resulting 
in new scoping behavior
different from normal ECMA

Why is this discrepancy ok?  Is any explanation coming?

Regards,
Chris


-- 
Chris Davis
Interact Incorporated R&D
512-502-9969x117

Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 14:25:45 UTC