- From: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 14:22:03 +0200
- To: Chris Davis <davisc@iivip.com>
- CC: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>, "www-voice@w3.org" <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Chris, We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to re-publish the CCXML-IR in a short term. Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider implicitly accepted the resolution. If you need clarification, please ask them very soon. Paolo Baggia Author of CCXML-IR Plan ISSUE-701: Proposed Resolution: Accept Fine to add a transition for 'conference.unjoined' event in 10_5_8_A.txml ================================= Chris: This is tracked as ISSUE-701. --- RJ Auburn CTO, Voxeo Corporation tel:+1-407-418-1800 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting +1-407-418-1800 end_of_the_skype_highlighting Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit June 21st - June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel Register today for your All Access Pass: http://www.voxeo.com/summits/customer On May 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Chris Davis wrote: > Hello www-voice, > > This jumbo test sheet needs a do-nothing transition for conference.unjoined; as written the test errors out upon conference.unjoined. > That is, assertion 889 will show as PASS in the logs but you won't see the PASS 890 because the queue logic > gets confused due to the catch all transtion (event="*"). > > The unjoined occurs as a result of the VoiceXML dialog terminating. > > Regards, > Chris > > -- > Chris Davis > Interact Incorporated R&D > 512-502-9969x117
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 12:22:35 UTC