Re: April CCXML: 2 bugs in 8_3_B.txml [cc] ISSUE-696

Chris,

We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to re-publish the CCXML-IR in a short term.
Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider implicitly accepted the resolution. If you need clarification, please ask them very soon.

Paolo Baggia
Author of CCXML-IR Plan

ISSUE-696:

You are right on both the issues:
- condition will be changed into:
  <if cond=" session.dialogs[dID].src.search(/dialog.vxml/) > -1 ">
- fine to add a transition for 'conference.unjoined' event

=================================
This is tracked as ISSUE-696.

---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +1-407-418-1800      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit
June 21st - June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel
Register today for your All Access Pass:  
http://www.voxeo.com/summits/customer

On May 11, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Chris Davis wrote:

> Hello www-voice,
> 
> 1)
> <if cond="session.dialogs[dID].src.match(/^(http)|(file):\/\/.+\/6_2_686.ccxml&amp;/) != null">
> won't work to check the existance of the proper URI of dialog.vxml.
> 
> 2) the <dialogterminate> results in both dialog.exit and conference.unjoined. The .txml has no
> handler for conference.unjoined, which causes the catch-call transition to queue up another
> user.PREPARE_NEW handler, triggering its transition to index past the end of assertions[] array.
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> 
> -- 
> Chris Davis
> Interact Incorporated R&D
> 512-502-9969x117

Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 12:06:28 UTC