W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: April CCXML: test id 555 incorrect? [cc] ISSUE-689

From: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:55:08 +0200
To: Chris Davis <davisc@iivip.com>
CC: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>, www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20E062AE0851CC41B7FBECC23638796F3946463E03@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>

We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to re-publish the CCXML-IR in a short term.
Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider implicitly accepted the resolution. If you need clarification, please ask them very soon.

Paolo Baggia
Author of CCXML-IR Plan


Proposed Resolution: Accept

Our proposal is to Reject #555, because we were unable to find in the current CCXML-IR framework any reasonable way to test this assertion.


this is tracked as ISSUE-689. 


RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +1-407-418-1800      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit
June 21st - June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel
Register today for your All Access Pass:  

On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Chris Davis wrote:

> Hello www-voice,
> Assertion #555 appears to test that the error.allowed event's id is set
> correctly after a <cancel> of an ID that does not exist.
> It is my understanding that "id" should be set to the value passed
> to the failing <cancel>'s sendid.
> <cancel sendid="send_id_1"/> <!-- is bogus -->
> The test currently checks <if cond="event$.id==session.id">
> which looks to be incorrect. I'm assuming it should be equivalent
> to send_id_1.
> This appears in 9_2_5_A.txml.
> Thanks
> -- 
> Chris Davis
> Interact Incorporated R&D
> 512-502-9969x117
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 14:55:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:03:56 UTC