- From: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:00:36 +0200
- To: Chris Davis <davisc@iivip.com>
- CC: www-voice@w3.org
Chris, Thanks for your response. Again, it is clear how a CCXML implementation should behave to pass this test but my goal is to clarify the CCXML specification: should the enctype attribute be ignored in this case or should it cause an error? I believe it should be stated more explicitly in the specification. And "case-insensitiveness" of the get attribute should be explicitly declared as well. Thanks, Petr -- Petr Kuba, Project Manager OptimSys, s.r.o kuba@optimsys.cz Tel: +420 541 143 065 Fax: +420 541 143 066 http://www.optimsys.cz On 27.5.2010 19:44, Chris Davis wrote: > Petr, > > Here is what we do... > > When the method is "get" we send any namelist'd variables as part of the > URL and ignore enctype. > > When the method is "post" we then examine enctype if there are > namelist'd vars to determine how to attach > them to the "post" request. > > Regards, > Chris > > Petr Kuba wrote: >> Hello www-voice, >> >> In 7_1, assertion 456, the 'enctype' attribute is used in >> <dialogprepare> although the value of the 'method' attribute is "post". >> >> According to the Specification, 7.2.1.2, the 'enctype' attribute is >> "Valid only when the value of the method is 'post'". What does it mean >> that the atribute is "valid"? Does it mean that 'enctype' MUST not be >> used if the value of the 'method' is "get"? Or does it mean that >> 'enctype' can be used and is just ignored? >> >> Furthermore, we recommend to state explicitly that the value of the >> 'method' attribute is case-insensitive in all elements where this >> attribute appears. This is stated in Appendix L3 but not in the >> description of elements. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Petr >> > >
Received on Friday, 28 May 2010 07:01:11 UTC