- From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:10:49 -0500
- To: "Yakulis, Ross (Ross)" <yakulis@avaya.com>
- Cc: www-voice@w3.org, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Ross, Thanks for the feedback on this. The working group has tracked this as ISSUE-325 and will review this to see when we could consider this for the CCXML specification. It may be a bit late in the process to go into CCXML 1.0 but we may want to look at this for CCXML 1.1. One way or another we will let you know the direction we wish to take once we have had a chance to review the issue internally. Thank you and best regards, RJ --- RJ Auburn CTO, Voxeo Corporation tel:+1-407-418-1800 On Jan 24, 2008, at 16:44:17, Yakulis, Ross (Ross) wrote: > Since the event attribute was removed in the last revision of the > CCXML spec, it follows (to me) that the state variable should be > implicitly defined at state$ and the attribute statevariable removed > from eventprocessor? > > Ross Yakulis >
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 14:11:36 UTC