- From: Barnett, James <James.Barnett@aspect.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:14:06 -0400
- To: "Serge Voloshenyuk" <serge_voloshenyuk@yahoo.com>, <www-voice@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <57686697B4E28949A90094A6469165C701BD2DC5@ASP1EXCH1.aspect.com>
Serge, It's important to understand that <parallel> counts as a state in evaluating the definition of 'conflict' (we should make this clearer in the spec). So both the definitions you have sent do involve conflicts because in both the two transitions both exit parallel state pr1. - Jim ________________________________ From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Serge Voloshenyuk Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:48 PM To: www-voice@w3.org Subject: Re: SCXML: Conflict definition Other variant for the same example: <scxml xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml" version="1.0" initialstate="prl"> <parallel id="prl"> <state id="p1"> <initial> <transition target="p1_1"/> </initial> <state id="p1_1"> <transition event="prl.done" target="end1"/> </state> </state> <state id="p2"> <initial> <transition target="p2_1"/> </initial> <state id="p2_1"> <transition event="prl.done" target="end2"/> </state> </state> </parallel> <state id="end1"> <initial> <transition target="end1_1"/> </initial> <state id="end1_1"/> <state id="end2"/> </state> </scxml> Now it's not conflict semantically. Because second transition can be treated as more precise targeting compare to first which target is more generalized. But final states are different. And what about actions? Must they be called both or only one? Then which, first or second? I don't think that document order must be considered here. In first because there is some semantical sense behind. And in second graphical visualization of SCXML will conceal document order. ________________________________ Bored stiff? <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49935/*http:/games.yahoo.com> Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49935/*http:/games.yahoo.com> on Yahoo! Games.
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 21:14:17 UTC