- From: Barnett, James <James.Barnett@aspect.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:27:36 -0400
- To: <www-voice@w3.org>, Torbjörn Lager <torbjorn.lager@gmail.com>
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 14:27:39 UTC
We have provisionally decided to reject the following change request. We think that <final> has a sufficiently distinct semantics that it deserves its own tag, separate from <state>. In particular, <final> may not contain transitions or substates. By making it a separate tag, we can capture this difference in the schema. >From Torbjorn Lager: I think <state id="s" final="true"/> is better than <final id="s"/>.
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 14:27:39 UTC