- From: Barnett, James <James.Barnett@aspect.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:11:23 -0400
- To: <www-voice@w3.org>, Torbjörn Lager <torbjorn.lager@gmail.com>
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 14:11:53 UTC
We have provisionally decided to accept the following change request for inclusion in the next version of the spec. <initial> will not have an "id" and will therefore not be able to be the target of a transition. >From Torbjorn Lager: 2.1 I don't think it makes sense to allow transitions into <initial>! (In other words, <initial> should not be considered a 'transition target'.) Reasons: 1) As far as I know (but I may be wrong), UML diagrams do not allow that, 2) it does not seem to increase expressivity, and 3) if we don't allow it, there is no need for <inital> to have an ID, which is a good thing...
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 14:11:53 UTC