www-voice@w3.org from April to June 2007 by date

Friday, 29 June 2007

• VXML XSD and class generation Bill Caneira

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

• question on XHMTL+VoiceXML (was Re: VoiceXML 2.1 is not a proposed recommendation) Kazuyuki Ashimura

Wednesday, 20 June 2007

• VoiceXML 2.1 is now a W3C Recommendation jim@larson-tech.com

Friday, 15 June 2007

• Re: Looking for valid SCXML.xsd Barnett, James
• Looking for valid SCXML.xsd Andrew Gilmartin
• Re: VoiceXML 2.1 is not a proposed recommendation Mayank Jain

Wednesday, 13 June 2007

• [ssml] Diff-marked version of SSML 1.1 second WD is available Kazuyuki Ashimura
• I: [f2f] Latest news and needed information Baggia Paolo
• Re: Possible missing content at http://www.w3.org/TR/ccxml/#connection.properties Kazuyuki Ashimura

Tuesday, 12 June 2007

• Re: Vail Reply to Comments on PLS Kurt Fuqua

Monday, 11 June 2007

• [ssml11] Second WD of SSML 1.1 and updated Requirements doc are published Kazuyuki Ashimura

Thursday, 7 June 2007

• Possible missing content at http://www.w3.org/TR/ccxml/#connection.properties Suhan Andrei

Thursday, 31 May 2007

• Comments on CCXML WD 19 January 2007 Petr Kuba

Wednesday, 23 May 2007

• Re: Vail Reply to Comments on PLS Baggia Paolo

Friday, 18 May 2007

• SCXML: Updated version of the Synergy SCXML-Lab Torbjörn Lager
• Re: Comments on CCXML Working Draft 19 January 2007 Hrvoje Nezic

Thursday, 17 May 2007

• Re: Query in CCXML 1.0 Specification. - Item 7 - ISSUE-228 RJ Auburn
• Re: Query in CCXML 1.0 Specification. Items 4/6 - ISSUE-225 ISSUE-227 RJ Auburn
• Re: Query in CCXML 1.0 Specification. - Item 5 - ISSUE-226 RJ Auburn
• Re: Query in CCXML 1.0 Specification. - Item 3 - ISSUE-224 RJ Auburn
• Re: Query in CCXML 1.0 Specification. - Item 2 - ISSUE-223 RJ Auburn
• Re: Query in CCXML 1.0 Specification. - Item 1 / ISSUE-222 RJ Auburn
• Re: query. RJ Auburn
• Re: VXML-CCXML integration - Updating VoiceXML session variables RJ Auburn

Wednesday, 16 May 2007

• SSML 1.1 April 2007 face-to-face meeting summary Daniel C. Burnett
• Re: SCXML: <send> and <event> Torbjörn Lager

Tuesday, 15 May 2007

• Re: SCXML: <send> and <event> Torbjörn Lager
• RE: SCXML: <send> and <event> Barnett, James
• SCXML: <send> and <event> Torbjörn Lager

Monday, 14 May 2007

• RE: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Barnett, James
• RE: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Serge Voloshenyuk

Friday, 11 May 2007

• RE: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Barnett, James
• Re: SCXML: XPath vs E4X Torbjörn Lager
• Re: SCXML: XPath vs E4X RJ Auburn
• Re: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Torbjörn Lager
• SCXML: XPath vs E4X Torbjörn Lager

Thursday, 10 May 2007

• RE: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Barnett, James
• Re: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Torbjörn Lager
• RE: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Barnett, James
• Re: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Torbjörn Lager
• Re: Comments on CCXML Working Draft 19 January 2007 RJ Auburn
• RE: SCXML: <invoke> etc. Barnett, James
• SCXML: <invoke> etc. Torbjörn Lager

Monday, 7 May 2007

• Re: SCXML: LCA bug ? Barnett, James
• Re: SCXML: LCA bug ? Torbjörn Lager
• SCXML: Expression Languages José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
• RE: SCXML: Transition spec reuse Barnett, James
• RE: SCXML: LCA bug ? Barnett, James
• SCXML: Transition spec reuse José Manuel Cantera Fonseca

Sunday, 6 May 2007

• SCXML: Paper available Torbjörn Lager
• SCXML: LCA bug ? Torbjörn Lager

Wednesday, 25 April 2007

• VoiceXML 2.1 is now a proposed recommendation Jim Larson
• VoiceXML 2.1 is not a proposed recommendation Jim Larson

Friday, 20 April 2007

• RE: [SCXML] <anchor> stuff? Serge Voloshenyuk
• RE: [SCXML] <anchor> stuff? Barnett, James
• [CCXML]Regarding namelist attribute Sajeesh

Thursday, 19 April 2007

• RE: [SCXML] <anchor> stuff? Serge Voloshenyuk
• RE: [SCXML] <anchor> stuff? Barnett, James

Wednesday, 18 April 2007

• Re: Relationship to WS-CDL Kazuyuki Ashimura

Monday, 16 April 2007

• RE: [SCXML] <anchor> stuff? Serge Voloshenyuk
• RE: [SCXML] <anchor> stuff? Serge Voloshenyuk
• RE: [SCXML] <anchor> stuff? Barnett, James

Saturday, 14 April 2007

• [SCXML] <anchor> stuff? Serge Voloshenyuk

Friday, 13 April 2007

• Re: Relationship to WS-CDL Kohei Honda
• RE: Parallelism in state chart XML Barnett, James

Thursday, 12 April 2007

• Parallelism in state chart XML johnpremi

Wednesday, 11 April 2007

• Relationship to WS-CDL Steve Ross-Talbot

Tuesday, 10 April 2007

• [SCXML] task attribute Serge Voloshenyuk
• Re: allowing <onentry> and <onexit> inside <final> Serge Voloshenyuk
• Re: allowing <onentry> and <onexit> inside <final> Torbjörn Lager

Monday, 9 April 2007

• Re: allowing <onentry> and <onexit> inside <final> Serge Voloshenyuk

Thursday, 5 April 2007

• Re: allowing <onentry> and <onexit> inside <final> Torbjörn Lager
• RE: allowing <onentry> and <onexit> inside <final> Barnett, James
• Semantic Interpretation for Speech REcognition now a full W3C recommendation Jim Larson
• [SCXML] Rejected: make "final" an attribute Barnett, James
• [SCXML] Accepted: make <final> optional as child of <scxml> Barnett, James
• [SCXML] Rejected: allowing only a single <final> state Barnett, James
• [SCXML] Not allowing <initial> to be the target of a transition Barnett, James
• allowing <onentry> and <onexit> inside <final> Barnett, James
• Allowing "initial" to be an attribute Barnett, James

Wednesday, 4 April 2007

• allowing <transition> as a child of <parallel> in SCXML Barnett, James
• Correction: Removal of the 'task' attribute from SCXML Barnett, James
• Removal of the <log> tag from SCXML Barnett, James

Tuesday, 3 April 2007

• CCXML : Query regarding error.semantic murulidhara

Last message date: Friday, 29 June 2007 04:34:53 UTC